Sound
city master plans always have great public spaces as a means to provide outdoor
living and community meeting spaces as well as areas for recreation and
sometimes a "green" relief from the dense built up environment. In
places like Italy, the piazza is the standard urban public space that serves
most of these purposes, but rarely is it a space of green landscape.
Of
course New York has Central Park, an
oasis among the forest of high rises and one of the genuine drivers of people's
desire to own property along Central Park one of the most valuable addresses of
real estate in the world.
In
Asia the two competing cities of Hong Kong and Singapore also have their major
parks. Hong Kong's Victoria Park built in the
1950's on reclaimed land which used to be a typhoon shelter for boats. Singapore's Gardens by the Bay newly
opened in 2012 is also built on reclaimed land around Marina Bay. So how do
these parks compare?
This brief comparative overview is based on mostly site observations of both parks done in the last 12 months. You can say it is an analysis of a “snap shot” in time. Clearly Victoria Park with a much longer history and having gone through a major renovation in 2000 to 2002 has probably evolved much over time and one would imagine that Gardens by the Bay with the southern portion less developed will also evolve over time especially when more surrounding developments move into the adjacent sites.
Scale
Both
site are quite substantial for being located within major city center and if
sold for real estate development, both could be considered as governments
giving up significant “land sale revenue”, but at the city planning scale it is
partially the fact that the parks exist that have and will drive adjacent
property values.
Location
Both
parks are located on reclaimed land with mass transit stations providing direct
access for most of the city population.
In the case of Victoria Park, there are 2 stations one located at each
of the ends of the park, while in the Gardens by the Bay there is currently
only one stop which is rather centrally located but due to the scale of the
park it does not give very convenient access to all of the park. This too will probably change with time as
the MRT system expands. In addition
Victoria Park being located adjacent to the main shopping belt of Causeway Bay
and significant dining location of Tin Hau there are an abundance of F&B
facilities to support the park.
In
the case of Gardens by the Bay, currently being located a distance away from
current developed areas, it is much more isolated and lacks any real F&B
support other than those which are tenants to the park. And as most government facilities F&B
outlets were probably tendered out and hence went to the highest bidders and
cost of F&B is reflected in that. As
Marina Bay is still in its infancy, this too will evolve over time and
hopefully more development will yield more diversity and choice.
Character
This
is a point where at the present snap shot in time the two parks are very different. The Gardens by the Bay has the distinct feel
of being a Theme Park Tourist Attraction. This is reinforced in both the product
design and aesthetics. The Flower Dome,
Cloud Forest and Skybridge are all seen as paid admission attractions. The park is essentially a living museum with
plants and landscape materials as the museum exhibits. The Super Tree Grove are iconic pieces that
are well suited for post cards.
On
my last visit newly noticed from my
original visit when it first opened is the guided tram tours that starts right
from the arrival point just outside the MRT Station. In addition the souvenir shop and theme park
type and priced F&B all reinforce the fact further. A small cart selling water and ice cream from
Gardens by the Bay was the only non-sit in type facility for F&B and as one
young Singaporean Boy yelled out as he passes the cart with his family , “…….wa
la, twenty dollars for ice cream!!!!! “ (I believe in reference to the amount it would
cost to buy ice cream for his family of 4 or 5.)
Victoria
Park on the other hand is perceived to be a recreation park for residents by the simple fact that a good 50% of
the land area is devoted to sport facilities, hard soccer courts, tennis,
basketball, lawn bowling as well as swimming pools. The large hard soccer courts are the largest
most dominant spaces and serves as multi-function spaces for special events
such as Chinese New Year fairs and the starting and ending location for large
rallies and demonstrations.
The
other half of the park is largely tree covered with various pockets of space
for smaller activities such as picnicking, model boat racing as well as groups for dancing or martial
arts. The park itself probably doesn’t
have any picture post card image or aesthetic but the large soccer courts are
probably the most identifiable space to the park and probably recognized by all
the locals but hardly of interest to tourists.
Surrounding Land Use
At
current time the only real development fronting Gardens by the Bay is the
Marina Bay Sands whose east facing hotel rooms have commanding views of the
park. The rest of the surrounding land
is zoned by the URA as generally “white” sites meaning that when they are sold
off the developers will be given some flexibility in what to develop in terms
of mixed use commercial, residential, hotel, retail, etc. The whole of Marina
Bay is just that a bay development with significant water frontage and one can
certainly question the logic of dedicating such a large amount of land and
investment to an area with already significant attractive physical
features. In the end it is either
commendable as “generous gift to the
public” or “ill logical” to spend
so much and give away so much to an area that is already attractive due to the
abundant shoreline!
For
Victoria Park on one edge is the National Library and the adjacent Causeway Bay
Sports Ground which spatially extends the open space another 35%. Beyond the Sports Grounds and along the east
and west edges of the park are 15 to 30+ story buildings mostly residential
with some hotel and commercial. The
northern edge is pretty much bound by the highway and the Causeway Bay, shelter
for boats. One of the unfortunate things
is the Causeway Bay Commercial side has an elevated road that somewhat acts as a
physical barrier to rest of the district and restricts the feel of the space
flowing together.
End Users
Clearly
the difference in character as well as stage of development determines the end
users of the two parks. On the one hand
Gardens by the Bay located in a new location with very little surrounding
occupied developments and conceived more as a Theme Park and is heavy in
attracting tourists. My recent Sunday
visit in an afternoon on a relatively cool day there was a very small number of
locals or even domestic helpers on their day off. The park was somewhat quiet mostly with
international tourist having their photos in some of the iconic backgrounds.
One of the most telling signs of how the park
is conceived is the actual sign in the park saying NO BIKES OR SAKEBOARDS, the
activities you would expect in a public park for the residents.
Having
traveled by Victoria Park daily for almost 3 years it is apparent the daily use
is by the residents of Hong Kong, users of the sports facilities are always
abundant, the landscaped area are all used as exercise and play areas for the
general public, especially elderly and children. On Sundays the domestic
workers all congregate at the park in various clustered groups both in the canopy of trees and open areas. Some of the week end events also cater to the
domestic workers such as open markets on Sundays, and let's not forget the park is one of the favorite starting and ending points of public demonstrations!
Snap Shot Conclusion
Both
parks provide a significant open space to the respective cities and make
attractive living environments for adjacent development. Knowing Singapore’s URA plans for the long
term, we can imagine that over the course of development in the Downtown Marina
Bay area the park will evolve and more than likely to have parts that are more suitable
for activities for downtown residents. In
any case the Marina Bay Development anchored by the Marina Bay Sands has been a
lesson in a city developing / expanding its downtown to a green field site and
the Gardens by the Bay is just another step in the whole process. Clearly Singapore is of the approach to use tourism as a catalyst!
We would also hope that in the future Gardens by the Bay will take on all the daily activities and traffic that Victoria Park currently has making Singapore's downtown living among one of the most attractive in the world.
It will be interesting to watch the evolution of
the parks and perhaps another review in 10 years will be in order. Perhaps the land surrounding Victoria Park my go through some significant redevelopment and hence a good reason to consider further redevelopment of the park.
No
|
Subject
|
Singapore
|
Hong Kong
|
1.
|
Park Name
|
Gardens by the Bay
|
Victoria Park
|
2.
|
Year Opened
|
2012
|
1957
|
3.
|
Location
|
Reclaimed Land in Marina Bay
|
Reclaimed Land on Hong Kong Island
|
4.
|
Scale
|
60 ha (+- measured from map)
|
19 ha
|
5.
|
Accessibility
|
Bayfront MRT Station
|
Tin Hau and Causeway Bay MTR Stations. Tin Hau Bus Terminal
|
6.
|
Character
|
Botanic Museum / Theme Park
|
Recreation Park
|
7.
|
Surrounding Land use
|
Integrated Resort
|
National Library, Commercial, Mixed Use, High Density Residential.
|
8.
|
Climate and Design
|
Year round tropical climate makes it not very attractive for day time
visits.
|
Combination of 4 seasons, lots of mature shade trees and fact it is used
largely for recreation make it useable year round day and night.
|
9.
|
Operations and Programming
|
Tourism Product for both inbound and local visitors
|
Daily use park for leisure and recreation more for local population.
|
Web Sites
|
|
|
|
10.
|
End Users
|
“Tourist” both foreign and local
|
Recreation and gatherings as well as events.
|
Jiwa Studio, Singapore
November 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep comments brief. Thanks for visiting our site. Jiwa Studio.