In an earlier
post, I stress the need for integrated planning to make mass transit
successfully and hence a higher quality sustainable living environment and
lifestyle. See the excerpt from 25.0 Jakarta Mass Transit, Development Planning and Economics below or
click on the hyperlink in the title to see the whole post.
Density
of land along with the convenience of Mass Transit always makes
land more valuable. Governments have the ability to dictate
development zoning and density and directly alter the land value and this is
exactly what governments like Jakarta should do to finance and make Mass
Transit viable and effective once it is built.
Singapore Queenstown MRT Station with Density and new high rise apartments being added. |
So how does one execute the rezoning to land around transit stations in order to increase density? This question can only be answered by the legal experts of the individual country in which is being discussed, but below are a few possible examples. Not being a legal expert by any means, these are more intuitive common sense recommendations. The policy and strategy in the 4th approach below is really the strategy that I am tabling in this blog post.
1. Authoritarian Power - This one is easy, if an absolute authority
has the power either person or committee and it’s what is wanted then it’s
done.
2. Eminent Domain – in some countries there
are law such that the Government has the right to acquire land in order to do
something for the benefit of the whole population.
3. People’s Mandate – In some countries the
votes of the people will determine what can and cannot be done. In this case the general population must
support the initiative and this of course can only be done if they totally
understand it and agree to it. Most of
the time these types of votes are for raising or adding taxes to fund public
facilities. In this case you would be
presenting an alternative to raising taxes.
Question will also be who has the right to vote, is the larger
population base or only the individual community in which a station is being
planned and potentially surrounding sites to be rezoned.
4. Rezone and allow Market Forces to Take its Course – this is an approach that can work together with option 3 above or
independently. Of course there are still
further legal issues but the key assumptions here is that the government has the right to rezone property, but maybe does not have the mandate to take land
or financial resources to buy back the land. The process I would imagine as follows:
a.
Master Plan - First important issue is
that the government must have a sound master plan to develop the mass transit
system this includes both physical, economic and operational. The right of way for the system must be in
their control and investment cost clearly identified with sufficient
contingencies.
b.
Funding - Since there are lots of aid
agencies and private investors willing to invest let’s assume the initial
investment is within reach, so building the physical network is viable in terms
of at least financing of initial cost.
The real question then becomes can the ridership make good use of it and
get it to an operational sustainable level?
And can there be a way to fund some of the cost through property value
where the government doesn’t own the land?
This is where the density around stations and property value needs to
come into play.
c.
Rezone the Land around Stations – Within
a walking distance of say 500m to the station all the property large or small
should be rezoned for high density mixed use commercial / residential development. It should be together with strict guidelines
on maximum unit sizes, maximum carparking allowed, strict definition of urban
edges to promote walking, strict use of ground levels. Plot ratios, height
limits and Building coverages should ultimately be as high as possible to
maximize the usage. The plot ratios I
will talk more about under Property Taxes below. The plot ratios should probably be granted in
2 phases.
d.
Property Taxes – Firstly we must have a
common understanding that property around major transit stations have a premium
value if transit is successful. With the
change in zoning and increase in
development entitlement comes associated increase in Property Taxes. For small property owners of say individual
houses, it will not make financial
sense to pay exorbitant property taxes while the rezone to commercial / residential mixed use will increase the land
value well above the residential property value. Potentially a win win! The rezoning should also not give the new
sites the ultimate desired maximum plot ratio to begin with but probably in 2
phases, which will allow the Government or partnership of the Government and
Transit Investor or to sell more plot ratio to the eventual developer prior to
actual redevelopment.
So in summary
once rezoning is done and property taxes raised the smaller lot owners will through economic
forces sell to a developer who can build density. The developer
can then further increase the density by buying entitlement from the Government
and Transit Operator joint venture.
In working out
this system, it is probably best to fix
a maximum price of the entitlement for at least a given time period so
it doesn’t become a stand off of negotiating price and hence no density at all
gets built by stations.
Remember our overall objective is to provide density
at stations for transit to be fully utilized and hence operationally sustainable
and in the mean time allow Investors in transit to recover some of the upfront
costs.
Within this overall all
principle and process there are lots of variations that can be considered
depending on the variable of local laws and development practices, etc.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep comments brief. Thanks for visiting our site. Jiwa Studio.