Integrated Master Planning - the
process of Orchestrating the
vast range of technical and professional disciplines in order to execute a
development. This includes marketing,
environmental analysis, programing, physical planning, economic planning,
social planning, execution and
operations planning.
In discussing each part of the Integrated Master Planning for Destination Development process, I
will use the same methodology which is answering the following questions.
1. What
is the objective of this phase of the process?
To come up with a physical plan that will turn the design
brief into a reality. Transform
all the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the design brief into a
physical plan that will realize the business and development vision.
From this physical plan you then can test the investment required by
calculating the actual development cost with accurate quantities.
The physical plan will also be used to develop the physical
phasing and from here you can test the product, scale, investment cost and
compare to potential revenue.
2. What expertise is involved in this phase of
the process?
Of course the lead here is the Architect / Master Planner,
but it is definitely wise to have the whole team in at strategic times to
review the whole process and provide valuable feedback during the process. Certainly Engineering consultants and Landscape
are some of the more critical team member to be involved, but in some cases
cost, marketing and operations maybe just as important.
3. What are some of the common mistakes?
One of the most common mistakes during the physical design
process is to proceed without a clear enough design brief which as noted in the
previous section leads to going round in circles with lots of trial and
error.
The second most common mistake is having the designer work in
isolation. That is the design proceeds
and goes into intricate detail without other key consultant input such as
engineering, landscape and operations.
4. Any other issues that relate to this phase?
This phase the Orchestrator plays a key role to keep things in
line with the design brief, but also identifies where variations are in the
best interest of the development and the business.
This stage is time consuming and the most expensive in terms of
professional consultant work. But it has
an even greater impact on both investment cost and potential revenue so it needs
to be orchestrated with professional expertise that can make critical
judgments in the process of coordinating relating to a vast range of issues
from design, to construction and economics, etc.
The Cost Plan, Physical
Planning / Design, and Product
Development are all developed in an interactive process together and cannot
be seen solely in isolation as a “phase” of development on its own.
Go to previous parts of the series and look for future parts.
Part 1 – Need for a Methodology?
Part 2 – Environmental / SiteAnalysis
Part 3 – Market Analysis
Part 4 – Product DevelopmentPart 5 - Physical Planning / Design
Part 6 - Cost Plan
Part 7 - Business Master Plan
Part 8 - Site Execution
Part 9 – Operations Management
Part 10 - Review and Revise
Jiwa Studio
Singapore, December 2011
http://jiwastudioweb.blogspot.com/
• Well said. An EXCELLENT outline.
ReplyDeleteWalter Kukulka
(from Linkedin Urban Design Network discussion)
The Process you are outlining and detailing is excellent. When this process is engaged and executed in a project development, it creates the best opportunity for success. The Opportunities and Constraints of the physical aspects can easily be measured against the costs/benefits of implementation. Having a plan such as this allows the owner/development team to accurately measure the costs and gauge the likelihood of a financially and socially successful project.
ReplyDeleteThe value of this process applies to projects of all sizes.
• Great guideline even for any project!!!!
ReplyDeleteAurora Martinez
(from Linkedin Urban Planning Group discussion)
• CONGRATUATION......A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDELINE IS THE KEY TO SUCCES....THANKS BERTRAM, I will follow you....
ReplyDeleteGrethel Castellanos
(from Linkedin Urban Planning Group discussion)
• This is fine.
ReplyDeleteAjaya Kumar
(from Linkedin Urban Planning Group discussion)
Thanks all for your comments, had lots of views to the series and lots of positive comments on being "text book", which I have to agree although I haven't seen it outlined simply quite the same way.
ReplyDeleteA common comment was on the difficulty people have in putting such a methodology into practice due to established practices, time schedules, political issues, etc! I always find as professionals, it's our job to exectute best practices whether we need to spell it out in such an academic manner or not. Good luck in the execution everyone!