As Asia proceeds on the fast pace to
development there is an abundance of “Mega Projects” usually by private
developers and they target to bring in the big chains and branded outlets. Every mall in Asia has a Watsons, Guardian,
Giordano, Nike, Adidas, etc, etc. For
anchor tenants it’s usually one of the department stores and of course a chain
supermarket, while the fast food you’ll always find KFC and McDonalds and for
coffee Starbucks.
Typical Asian Shopping Mall has become almost comodity of space with "standard" tenants. |
Certainly there is a need for these
types of outlets especially if the target market is for local daily
conveniences, but there is no product differentiation if by tenant mix
all malls are equal! The customer catchmen will only be limited to the neighboring vicinity.
Private shop ownership, whether its
street front commercial or owning a kiosk within a larger shopping complex
brings diversity of product. But this can be a double edged sword as it too may not yield the optimum tenant mix or products. In tourism
related shopping, there is an even much greater need for this type of diversity
giving outlets for local products and F&B.
Over 20 years ago when I first came
to Asia there used to be much more small family businesses running various
shops, bakeries and F&B outlets. Most shopping was in shop fronts or in malls
with multiple ownership and it would be a surprise walking around and finding
new and unique shops and products.
Places like Bali where individual owners still are the majority you can
still wander for hours along shopping streets and find all types of one off
products, either crafts, arts or fashions as well as F&B outlets. It is this that makes Bali a shopper’s
paradise. Some of this is slowly
disappearing as mass wholesalers corner the market and have their product
easily sold in every street corner, much as you will find ABC Store on every
block of Waikiki, Hawaii.
This need for diversity of the Small and Medium Enterprise
not only is desirable in retail, but also in F&B as well as small
hotels. For destinations like Bali can
thrive on repeat visitors and long stay visitors because of this
diversity. The tourist that stays in
Kuta Beach for a week can eat in a different outlet every day and still have
hundreds of choices available for the next meal. And these are outlets that they cannot find
anywhere but in Bali.
Likewise having stayed for a week
and enjoyed the variety as well as competitive pricing the tourist is likely to
return for another week and this time trying another accommodation. In fact may choose to try 2 or 3 different
locations on the next trip having seen the variety available.
Small independent home grown hotel in Bali |
When you look at retailing and dining as entertainment, certainly there is a value in diversity and in particular that of the SME. These businesses bring their own special touch that is missing from chains and franchises and it is this that gives the life and soul to a destination.
In some of the commercial
developments, the shophouse a common and originally wonderful building typology
has become the “urban blight” of Southeast Asia. It has in most cased become the equal to the
strip malls of suburban America. This primarily in the hands of the large
developers where masses are built and sold as a commodity where investors can
bank their money in a hard asset as opposed to keeping it in “fiat
money”. Unfortunately the impact
on the cityscape is generally negative.
The old shophouse of Penang or Singapore never had such monopolies by
single developers where the same unit was repeated for unbearably long
stretches or at least from the look of the streetscape, you could not
tell. The traditional shophouse always
fronted road and made streets where now they face parking lots just as their
American counterpart strip malls.
New Batam Shophouses |
Singapore Heritage Shophouse in Chinatown |
Some developers now days do try to
diversify the design and make a variety of elevations, but the basic planning principle,
masses or endless row of shophouses fronting parking away from the real road.
The only real objective to generate cash
regardless of how of it is ultimately used is the same, hence the impact on the
city does not change much, purely urban blight! Mostly end up as unoccupied investments banking on capital appreciation.
For master developers and
governments to sell wholesale to a developer that will mass produce say 200
units of something is much easier and faster to show results in the accounts,
but does the built environment eventually measure up to the financial accounts?
It’s hard to find a positive example, but probably there is one out there.
Ultimately governments are accountable and need to have some control and take responsibility so smaller
developers and independent business can find a place in the city adding both
diversity in physical development as well as consumer products in retail,
F&B as well as residential.
That’s not to say large developers
should not be allowed, but the governments need to put the right balance as well as physical and policy guidelines so they
all can find a harmony in the physical urban design, operators that come in to
make a city lively, while both small and large developers can be
profitable.
The personal touch of restaurants like Babek Bengil give a location real character. |
Small unique boutiques add welcome surprizes for shoppers |
Jiwa
Studio
Singapore, December 2011http://jiwastudioweb.blogspot.com/
Large scale developments are not just a planning issue but also the result of the financial system. The complexity and scale of the financial system facilitates the development of megamalls. It feeds off each other. Reduce the financials system to simple lending (ie non- fractional) and the scale of development comes down as well.
ReplyDeletethedevelopmentadvisor.com